top of page

Labour's Race Equality Act: An Attempt at Tackling Racial Inequalities

The Labour Party has unveiled plans for a Race Equality Act aimed at strengthening legal protections and promoting equal opportunities for ethnic minorities across the UK. This legislation seeks to address persistent racial disparities that have long plagued British society. Fair treatment is a fundamental right for everyone. It's crucial to recognise how our economic structures reflect power imbalances influenced by racial discrimination.

At the core of the proposed Act is the extension of equal pay rights to Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) workers, treating pay discrimination claims based on race or ethnicity on par with existing gender protections. This move could significantly impact employment practices and wage equity.

Additionally, the Act would allow for claims of "dual discrimination" based on a combination of protected characteristics, such as race and gender. This intersectional approach acknowledges the compounded disadvantages faced by individuals experiencing multiple forms of discrimination.

Public services, including the NHS, police, schools, and councils, would also be required to collect and report data on staffing, pay, and outcomes by ethnicity. This transparency measure aims to promote accountability and inform targeted interventions to address disparities within organizations.

Proponents argue that the Race Equality Act is a necessary step towards achieving true racial equality, while critics caution about potential unintended consequences and the need for a more comprehensive approach beyond just legal reforms. Here are some potential pros and cons:


1. Addresses long-standing racial pay gaps and discrimination.

2. Recognises intersectional discrimination faced by many.

3. Promotes transparency and accountability in public services.

4. Could drive organisational changes to foster diversity and inclusion.

5. Provides legal recourse for victims of racial discrimination.


1. Potential complexity and burden on employers, especially regarding equal pay claims.

2. Concerns about exacerbating differences across various equality laws.

3. Questions about whether legislation alone can drive meaningful systemic change.

4. Lack of robust data on current law's deficiencies may hinder effectiveness.

5. Potential for unintended consequences and increased litigation.

As the debate continues, the Labour Party's proposals have reignited discussions around the role of legislation in combating racial discrimination and promoting an inclusive society that provides equal opportunities for all, regardless of ethnicity or background.

Ultimately, the success of these measures will depend on their implementation, enforcement, and the broader societal commitment to addressing systemic disadvantages faced by ethnic minorities in various spheres of life.

Ethnicity pay gap reporting represents a positive step towards transparency.

Many labour equality advocacy organisations endorse Labour’s proposal for a legal framework. It's encouraging to see organisations such as British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and Barnardo's voluntarily publishing their ethnicity pay gap data as part of their anti-racist strategies.

Structural racism in the labour market is a significant issue, and mandating organisations to report their data marks a turning point. However, meaningful institutional change is essential beyond this step. Accountability is key to effectively reducing ethnicity pay gap disparities and promoting racial equity in the workplace.

Legislating ethnicity pay gap reporting mirrors the gender pay gap reporting law, introduced in 2017. Employers with 250 or more employees annually must report their gender pay gap data. However, challenges include data misunderstandings and the exclusion of social factors influencing pay gaps. Ethnicity pay gaps often intertwine with societal factors like gender, education, class, geography, birthplace, occupational segregation, and recruitment bias, forming a broader context based on race and requires a nuanced understanding and a deeper legislative framework.

For the Race Equality Act to effectively recognise intersectional disparities impacting pay under its 'dual discrimination' policy, it is crucial to address the shortcomings in both the gender pay gap reporting law and Labour’s Race Equality Act, particularly for Black and Minoritised Ethnic women. Alternatively, collaborating with anti-racist organisations and consultants with years of pay gap disparity research, alongside directly involving those affected by racial disparities, could yield productive outcomes.

In Spain, the 2007 Organic Law on Equality between Men and Women mandates companies with over 50 employees to develop and implement an equality plan agreed upon by management and worker representatives. This law's cultural change is noteworthy, fostering collaboration between workers and those directly impacted. While this initiative is still evolving, it shows more advancement compared to the UK.

The Race Equality Act necessitates a transformative approach by implementing policies that address discriminatory attitudes perpetuating low-paid work, limited rights, and restricted opportunities for progression, significantly impacting Black and Ethnic Minoritised employees.

How do we stop this cycle from becoming the norm?

Christabelle Quaynor,

Policy and Influence Officer


Ditipriya Acharya,

Senior Media, Marketing and Communications Officer

Sources and References:



bottom of page